Kolisko to now - a review
Posted: 11 Nov 2014, 09:14
From Kolisko to nowadays: progresses and discoveries in agro-homeopathy
Giovanni Dinelli, Ilaria Marotti, Grazia Trebbi, Lucietta Betti
ABSTRACT
The use of ultra-diluted preparations method in agriculture was introduced with agro-homeopathy, which
allows to influence biological processes of plants by either accelerating or delaying growth. Moreover, it can
contribute to the control of plagues and diseases, directly promoting an increase of the yield and an
improvement of product qualitative traits. Since the pioneering works of Kolisko on wheat germination [1]
and Junker on growth of microorganisms (paramecium, yeast, fungi) [2], in the last 30 years work has
flourished from independent researchers from worldwide (Americas, Europe and Australasia).
The international research works on agro-homeopathy can be conceptually divided in two main groups: effects
of ultra-diluted preparations on crop growth and applicability for crop disease control.
The first type of investigations usually are carried out on both healthy organisms for determining the growth
stimulation of treatments and on abiotically stressed plants (i.e. heavy metal over-exposition, salt excess,
water and nutrients deficiency) for determining the re-growth stimulation of ultra-dilutions [3,4].
The second type of investigations are usually performed on artificially diseased organisms (i.e. fungal and
viral pathogens or nematode infection), which may react more markedly to homeopathic treatments than
healthy ones [5].
Unfortunately, on the basis of the extensive critical review of published papers, there is little firm evidence to
support the reliability of the reported results. Except for a limited number of publications, the most common
drawbacks of agro-homeopathy researches are the poor experimental methodology and the inadequate
statistical analysis. Moreover, since there is no agricultural homeopathic pharmacopoeia, much work is
required to find suitable remedies, potencies and dose levels.
Considering the criticism on the practical applicability of ultra-diluted preparations, in order to be accepted as
a valid part of agricultural practices a well-structured research strategy for agro-homeopathy is needed. This
is often hampered by methodological problems as well as by the general underinvestment on the academic
and nonacademic research structures.
Fundamental researches based on collaborative approaches (i.e. ring tests on selected crop models) and on
common experimental protocols (i.e. statistical robustness) are the keys for determining the worldwide
acceptability of agro-homeopathy as a sustainable agro-technique.
Keywords: agro-homeopathy, ultra-diluted preparations, experimental methodology, statistical analyses
Giovanni Dinelli, Ilaria Marotti, Grazia Trebbi, Lucietta Betti
ABSTRACT
The use of ultra-diluted preparations method in agriculture was introduced with agro-homeopathy, which
allows to influence biological processes of plants by either accelerating or delaying growth. Moreover, it can
contribute to the control of plagues and diseases, directly promoting an increase of the yield and an
improvement of product qualitative traits. Since the pioneering works of Kolisko on wheat germination [1]
and Junker on growth of microorganisms (paramecium, yeast, fungi) [2], in the last 30 years work has
flourished from independent researchers from worldwide (Americas, Europe and Australasia).
The international research works on agro-homeopathy can be conceptually divided in two main groups: effects
of ultra-diluted preparations on crop growth and applicability for crop disease control.
The first type of investigations usually are carried out on both healthy organisms for determining the growth
stimulation of treatments and on abiotically stressed plants (i.e. heavy metal over-exposition, salt excess,
water and nutrients deficiency) for determining the re-growth stimulation of ultra-dilutions [3,4].
The second type of investigations are usually performed on artificially diseased organisms (i.e. fungal and
viral pathogens or nematode infection), which may react more markedly to homeopathic treatments than
healthy ones [5].
Unfortunately, on the basis of the extensive critical review of published papers, there is little firm evidence to
support the reliability of the reported results. Except for a limited number of publications, the most common
drawbacks of agro-homeopathy researches are the poor experimental methodology and the inadequate
statistical analysis. Moreover, since there is no agricultural homeopathic pharmacopoeia, much work is
required to find suitable remedies, potencies and dose levels.
Considering the criticism on the practical applicability of ultra-diluted preparations, in order to be accepted as
a valid part of agricultural practices a well-structured research strategy for agro-homeopathy is needed. This
is often hampered by methodological problems as well as by the general underinvestment on the academic
and nonacademic research structures.
Fundamental researches based on collaborative approaches (i.e. ring tests on selected crop models) and on
common experimental protocols (i.e. statistical robustness) are the keys for determining the worldwide
acceptability of agro-homeopathy as a sustainable agro-technique.
Keywords: agro-homeopathy, ultra-diluted preparations, experimental methodology, statistical analyses